NEWS INFORMATION
date:2026-09-30 10:25:24 click:50
Porosity is the complaint that ends more casting discussions than any other defect. The conversation usually goes badly because both sides are using one word for two different problems, and because the stated requirement — no porosity — cannot be inspected and cannot be met. Sorting out which void type exists, where it forms and what it does to the part turns an argument into an engineering problem with a workable answer. It also explains why two suppliers quoting the same drawing can deliver parts with very different real quality at similar prices.

Gas porosity comes from air trapped in the cavity as molten metal arrives at high speed. The voids are round, smooth-walled and scattered, and they are usually found near the gate or wherever the fill front folded over itself. Shrinkage porosity comes from metal contracting as it solidifies without enough feed material to compensate. Those voids are irregular, often interdendritic, and they sit in thick sections and at junctions where the last metal to freeze was isolated. The distinction matters because the fixes are unrelated: gas porosity responds to venting and vacuum, shrinkage responds to gating, intensification pressure and section design. Asking for "better vacuum" to solve a shrinkage problem wastes time and money.
A vacuum valve on the die, combined with a sealed shot sleeve and a properly sealed parting line, evacuates the cavity before and during injection. Typical systems pull the cavity down to somewhere around 50 to 100 mbar absolute, which removes most of the air that would otherwise be entrained. The result is a measurable improvement in density, weld-line strength and consistency, and it unlocks heat treatment — a conventional die casting blisters when solution-treated because trapped gas expands. Vacuum is not magic: it does not compensate for a badly placed gate, and it will not remove gas generated by excessive lubricant or by a dirty charge of metal.
Local squeeze — a hydraulic pin that pushes into a thick section just as the metal solidifies — is the targeted answer to shrinkage porosity in a specific boss or boss-to-wall junction. It works because it applies pressure where feed metal can no longer flow. Intensification pressure, the pressure applied by the machine after the cavity is full, has to be high enough and fast enough to be effective; older machines with slow response simply cannot deliver it. Both approaches are process choices the die casting manufacturer makes, and asking whether a part programme uses them is a reasonable way to judge how seriously a supplier treats internal quality.
Sealing porous castings with a resin that is drawn into voids under vacuum and then cured is a mature, legitimate process. For a housing that must be pressure-tight, impregnation routinely raises pass rates from unacceptable to near-perfect and costs a small amount per part. What it does not do is restore mechanical strength in a structural section, and it does not survive high temperatures — most impregnation resins have service limits well below what a heat-treated structural casting might see. The sensible position is to allow impregnation for pressure-tightness requirements while prohibiting it on load-bearing features, and to require it to be disclosed rather than performed quietly.
The usable version of a porosity requirement has three parts. First, a zone map: which regions are critical, which are cosmetic, which are non-functional. Second, an acceptance level per zone, referenced to a recognised comparison standard such as ASTM E505 reference radiographs for aluminum die castings, with an agreed sampling frequency. Third, a destructive or mechanical check — tensile coupons from a defined location, or a bend or crush test — for applications where internal soundness drives performance. "Sound casting, no porosity" tells an inspector nothing and guarantees disputes at goods-in.
Pressure decay is the production workhorse: seal the cavity, pressurise with air, hold, and measure the drop. It is fast, needs no consumables and catches anything from about 10⁻² to 10⁻³ mbar·l/s depending on the fixture and part volume. Mass flow testing measures the make-up air needed to hold pressure and gives a direct leak rate rather than a pressure change, which suits automated lines with data capture. Helium or tracer-gas testing reaches orders of magnitude finer and is appropriate for sealed electronics or refrigerant circuits, at higher equipment cost and with a consumable. Specify pressure, dwell time and allowable decay in the drawing, and specify whether the test happens before or after machining — they are different tests.
Porosity is largely decided during tooling design. Simulation of fill and solidification, vacuum provision, gate sizing and overflow placement are all fixed once steel is cut. The cheapest intervention is a design review before tooling starts, with the section thicknesses the supplier thinks will be difficult identified in writing. After that point, the options shrink to process tuning, and if that fails, welding steel back into a die.
ASTM International. (2018). ASTM E505: Standard Reference Radiographs for Inspection of Aluminum and Magnesium Die Castings. ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2021). ASTM E155: Standard Reference Radiographs for Inspection of Castings. ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2021). ASTM E165/E165M: Standard Practice for Liquid Penetrant Testing. ASTM International.
North American Die Casting Association. (2018). NADCA Product Specification Standards for Die Castings (S-4P-2018). NADCA.
ASTM International. (2018). ASTM B85/B85M: Standard Specification for Aluminum-Alloy Die Castings. ASTM International.
ASM International. (2008). ASM Handbook, Volume 17: Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials. ASM International.
Botou Ruitai Die Casting Co., Ltd.
Copyright © 2026-202 https://www.ruitaidiecasting.com. All Rights Reserved Botou Ruitai Die Casting Co., Ltd.All rights reserved